The idea of a seven-year tribulation, commonly taught in some Christian circles, is largely based on only one verse—Daniel 9:27. This interpretation holds that the Antichrist will make a covenant with Israel for seven years, breaking it halfway through. However, a closer look suggests that this interpretation shifts the focus away from the true subject of the passage—Jesus Christ, not the Antichrist.
Daniel 9:24-27 outlines seventy “weeks” (or sets of seven years, equaling 490 years) that God has determined for His people. After 69 of these weeks, the Messiah is “cut off,” which refers to Jesus’ death in the 70th week, meaning this final week began with His ministry. The key question is: what happens during this last week?
Daniel 9:27 states, “And he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week: and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and oblation to cease.” While some believe the “he” refers to the Antichrist, the context of the previous verse points to the Messiah (Jesus). Thus, the “he” who confirms the covenant with “many” refers to Jesus, not the Antichrist. Jesus did, in fact, confirm the covenant during His ministry. At the Last Supper, He said, “This is my blood of the new covenant, shed for many” (Matthew 26:28). His ministry lasted exactly 3 1/2 years—half of the final seven-year period.
In the middle of the 70th week, Jesus was crucified, fulfilling the prophecy that He would “cause the sacrifice and oblation to cease.” His death on the cross ended the need for animal sacrifices because His sacrifice was the final, perfect atonement for sin. Hebrews 10:10-12 reinforces this, stating that Christ’s offering sanctified us “once for all,” and no further sacrifices are necessary. This event fulfilled Daniel’s prophecy in a spiritual sense, as it made the temple sacrifices obsolete.
This leaves the final 3 1/2 years, which many believe correspond to the tribulation described in the Book of Revelation. Revelation frequently mentions periods of 3 1/2 years (42 months, 1,260 days, or “a time, times, and half a time”) connected to the Great Tribulation. However, it’s important to note that Revelation never mentions a seven-year tribulation period. The idea of a seven-year tribulation wasn’t introduced until the 19th century, when John Darby popularized it. His interpretation added a seven-year framework that is not explicitly stated in Scripture, especially not in Revelation.
In conclusion, the idea of a seven-year tribulation is based on a narrow interpretation of Daniel 9:27 and a relatively recent theological development. A more careful reading shows that Daniel’s prophecy is centered on Jesus Christ, who fulfilled the first half of the 70th week through His ministry and crucifixion. The remaining 3 1/2 years likely refer to future events described in Revelation. This Christ-centered interpretation offers a clearer, more consistent understanding of both Daniel and Revelation, keeping Jesus—not the Antichrist—at the center of biblical prophecy.
One of the most overlooked aspects of how end-time prophecy is taught is the distinction between Israel and the Jews, which is often misunderstood. This differentiation is crucial for understanding biblical history and prophecy, as the northern tribes of Israel are distinct from the Jewish people who come from the tribe of Judah. While all Jews are descendants of Israel, the northern tribes of Israel were not considered Jewish, as the term “Jew” specifically refers to those from the tribe of Judah. This distinction dates back to the division of the united kingdom of Israel after the reign of King Solomon. Following his death, a civil war split the nation into two separate kingdoms: the northern Kingdom of Israel and the southern Kingdom of Judah
The northern Kingdom of Israel was composed of ten of the twelve tribes of Israel, while the southern Kingdom of Judah included the tribes of Judah and Benjamin, along with the priestly tribe of Levi. These two distinct kingdoms coexisted side-by-side for over 200 years, during which time a new term emerged that further differentiated these groups. During this period, they were often at odds and even engaged in warfare against each other on at least five different occasions.
It was during one of these conflicts that the term “Jew” first appeared in the Bible, referring specifically to those from the tribe of Judah. Therefore, “Jews” are descendants of the tribe of Judah and not from the northern Kingdom of Israel. There were no Jews in ancient Israel after the split, as the term applies only to those from the tribe of Judah in the southern kingdom.
Why is this distinction important? Because God gave specific promises to Abraham—worldly promises that were destined to be fulfilled through the northern Kingdom of Israel, and spiritual promises that were to be fulfilled through the southern Kingdom of Judah. This distinction between the promises is key to interpreting end-time prophecies correctly, as conflating the two can lead to misunderstanding God’s specific plans for each kingdom. However, most Bible prophecy teachers don’t make this distinction, and as a result, they often allocate promises made to the northern tribes of Israel to the Jewish people, which leads to confusion in understanding biblical prophecy.
The southern tribe of Judah holds a unique and significant place in biblical prophecy, as it was through this tribe that the Messiah would come. After the Babylonian exile, it was the people of Judah who returned to the Promised Land, rebuilding Jerusalem and reestablishing their presence. By the time of Jesus’ first coming, it was this same tribe that was present in Galilee and Judea. Additionally, in 1948, it was the descendants of the tribe of Judah who returned to the land and reestablished themselves as a nation, choosing the name Israel, even though they are specifically Jews, descendants of the tribe of Judah, not of the northern tribes of Israel. It’s important to recognize that the modern-day nation of Israel (Judah) represents only one of the 12 tribes of ancient Israel, leaving the promises and prophecies concerning the other tribes still distinct. This distinction is important for understanding both biblical history and modern prophetic interpretations.
The northern Kingdom of Israel, consisting of ten tribes, was given distinct promises from God through Abraham that focused on their future worldly influence and power. These tribes were promised to become a “commonwealth of nations” and to have a prominent role in the world. The blessings of Abraham to the northern tribes included becoming a multitude of people and possessing great wealth, land, and military strength. In prophecy, these tribes were foretold to rise as the most powerful nations in the end times, playingthe critical role in world affairs.
God declared through the prophets that if the Northern Kingdom of Israel turned to disobedience, they would face a lengthy and severe punishment. This punishment would involve being scattered among the nations and forgetting their identity. However, despite this judgment, God would remain faithful to His promises, ensuring that these ten tribes would re-emerge in the last days as the most prominent nations in the world.
in Amos 9:9, God says, “For, lo, I will command, and I will sift the house of Israel among all nations, like as corn is sifted in a sieve, yet shall not the least grain fall upon the earth.” Though scattered, God assured that not one of His people would be permanently lost. Hosea 9:17confirms, “My God will cast them away, because they did not hearken unto him: and they shall be wanderers among the nations.” Moreover, in Deuteronomy 32:26, God warned, “I said, I would scatter them into corners, I would make the remembrance of them to cease from among men.” These verses emphasize the loss of identity as part of the long punishment.
Importantly, Leviticus 26:18-28discusses how, if Israel continued in disobedience, their punishment would be extended “seven times “over, meaning their exile would be lengthened beyond its initial period. This suggests a prolonged and compounded punishment before their eventual restoration.
God also promised that, after this extended period of punishment, the scattered tribes would re-emerge in the last days as a powerful group of nations, fulfilling the covenant made with Abraham. Hosea 1:10declares, “Yet the number of the children of Israel shall be as the sand of the sea, which cannot be measured nor numbered; and it shall come to pass, that in the place where it was said unto them, Ye are not my people, there it shall be said unto them, Ye are the sons of the living God.” Not only will Israel be restored, but they will emerge with global influence, fulfilling their destiny and demonstrating God’s faithfulness to His covenant with His people.
For a deeper dive into these distinctions and promises, all the key points discussed here are thoroughly explained in the video linked below. This crucial distinction between Israel and the Jews carries significant implications for how we interpret Bible prophecy, especially in these last days. The video traces these biblical promises from scripture to their fulfillment, shedding light on how this understanding can transform the way we perceive God’s plan for Israel, Judah, and the nations. Be sure to watch it for a complete perspective on this vital topic.
TheHopeWithin.Me 